Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Deney Wassermann vs Jarno Jans Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wassermann vs Jans analysis and find out who is favored!
Deney Wassermann vs Jarno Jans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wassermann 1 - 0 Jans
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wassermann has won 52.58% of points on his second serve, while Jans has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wassermann, in recent form, has won 50.48% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jans has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.68% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wassermann has saved 60.66% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jans has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wassermann has won 50% of matches played (W/L 19/ 19), with Jans winning 33.33% (W/L 2/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wassermann has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 71/ 49), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3). Jans has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 36/ 17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 12/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Wassermann has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.35% of matches (W/L 19/ 18), where as Jans has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 2/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wassermann winning 0 times. They have played 1 sets in total, with Wassermann winning 1 and Jans winning 0. The last match between Wassermann and Jans was at the M25 Wetzlar, 03-08-2022, First, Clay with Deney Wassermann getting the victory 5-0 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:25:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wassermann and Jans have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wassermann winning 0 times and Jans 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wassermann winning 0, and Jans 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wassermann has played against opponents with an average rank of 190.68 while Jans has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wassermann has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jans has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wassermann has converted 38.75% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jans has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
781
Rank
696
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
869
Rank
792
High
23
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
59% (102-72)
Career Total W/L
62% (48-30)
53% (9-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Wassermann VS Jans H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Deney Wassermann | Jarno Jans |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 0 |
| Games Won | 5 | 0 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:25:0 | 0:25:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (15/24) | 67% (12/18) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (10/15) | 42% (5/12) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 67% (6/9) | 17% (1/6) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 67% (12/18) | 33% (8/24) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Wassermann VS Jans H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-0 ret. |
Stats 
Deney Wassermann
Player
Jarno Jans
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve %
67%
(
12 of
18)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
8 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
28
Total Points Won
14
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Deney Wassermann | Jarno Jans |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (20/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (185/163) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 56 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 68 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:10 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 181.88 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (619/1105) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (442/619) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (254/486) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (45/123) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (452/1133) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 53% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (9/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (7/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (7/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Deney Wassermann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Deney Wassermann
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
50%
(
55 of
109)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
11
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Deney Wassermann
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
13 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
1
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Naoki Tajima
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
98
Total Points Won
71
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
19 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Deney Wassermann
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve %
47%
(
7 of
15)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
78%
(
7 of
9)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
18
Total Points Won
10
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Deney Wassermann
50%
(
16 of
32)
1st Serve %
58%
(
15 of
26)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
10 of
16)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
30
Total Points Won
28
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Andrey Chepelev
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve %
79%
(
50 of
63)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Henry Searle
56%
(
60 of
108)
1st Serve %
67%
(
75 of
112)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
51 of
75)
63%
(
30 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
36 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(8) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Deney Wassermann
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
12 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
43
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Jarno Jans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Jarno Jans
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dax Donders
Player
Jarno Jans
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jarno Jans
Player
Marc Majdandzic
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Jarno Jans
39%
(
20 of
51)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jarno Jans
Player
Roland Stuurman
72%
(
73 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
8
49%
(
36 of
73)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
9 of
37)
58%
(
11 of
19)
Break Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
52%
(
53 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
59 of
98)
107
Total Points Won
92
|
5-7 6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Jarno Jans
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
68%
(
25 of
37)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
54
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Skander Mansouri
Player
Jarno Jans
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jarno Jans
Player
Nicolas Philibert
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
50
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine
Player
Jarno Jans
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jarno Jans
Player
Luca Tomasetto
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Wassermann Vs Jans Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
